Skip to content

Size Matters: Exploring the Relationship Between Feed Size and Crushing Capacity in Jaw Crushers and Cone Crushers

Size Matters: Exploring the Relationship Between Feed Size and Crushing Capacity in Jaw Crushers and Cone Crushers

When it comes to rock crushing equipment, size matters. The different types of crushers available in the market are used for crushing different types of materials. The ability of these machines to crush hard materials efficiently and effectively is impacted by the size of the feed material. In this article, we will explore the relationship between feed size and crushing capacity in jaw crushers and cone crushers.

Jaw crushers are primarily used for coarse crushing, while cone crushers are used for secondary and tertiary crushing. Both crushers have similarities in terms of operation and maintenance, but their crushing capacities are significantly different.

Feed size plays a significant role in determining the maximum crushing capacity of a crusher. Jaw crushers are known for their larger crushing chambers and high eccentricities, which allow them to easily process large-sized materials. Therefore, jaw crushers are typically used for primary crushing purposes, handling feed sizes up to 1000mm.

On the other hand, cone crushers have smaller crushing chambers and require a smaller feed size for efficient crushing. The cone crushers are designed to be used for secondary and tertiary crushing applications, with a maximum feed size of around 300mm.

The relationship between feed size and crushing capacity can be illustrated by taking a closer look at the operating principles of both jaw crushers and cone crushers.

In jaw crushers, the feed material is crushed between two moving jaw plates. The moving jaw plates exert a compressive force on the feed material, crushing it against the fixed jaw plate. This process reduces the size of the feed material, allowing it to pass through the opening at the bottom of the crusher.

In cone crushers, on the other hand, the feed material is crushed between a mantle and a concave. The mantle, which is fixed, and the concave, which is a moving part, exert a compressive force on the feed material. This process also reduces the size of the feed material, allowing it to pass through the opening at the bottom of the crusher.

The crushing capacity of a crusher depends on various factors, such as the type of material being crushed, the speed of the crusher, the closed-side setting (CSS), and the size of the discharge opening. However, the feed size is one of the most critical factors impacting the crushing capacity.

A jaw crusher with a larger feed size can handle larger-sized rocks and produce more fine aggregates. Conversely, a smaller feed size in a cone crusher will result in a finer product size, making it suitable for achieving higher crushing efficiencies.

In conclusion, the relationship between feed size and crushing capacity in jaw crushers and cone crushers is significant. Jaw crushers are best suited for primary crushing applications, handling larger-sized materials, while cone crushers are designed for secondary and tertiary crushing, requiring a smaller feed size. Understanding the impact of feed size on crushing capacity is crucial when selecting the appropriate crusher for a specific application.

Contact us

Related